Monday, February 15, 2010

Fitness of the body & mind - Part IV

In this article, we will look at the advantages/disadvantages of both aerobic and anaerobic exercises. Aerobic exercises are great for developing endurance/longevity. It gives you the energy to keep moving at a "constant speed" without getting exhausted. But it will not give you the strength and above all a nice shape to the body. So one has to do some strengthening/anaerobic exercises to build muscle power and also to develop a "sexy/figure flattering" body. Have you ever noticed that marathoners don't have a sexy body but sprinters/weight lifters do?

The purpose is to combine both types of exercises to get the maximum benefits. I would say, for a normal person who is not participating in Olympics or World Heavy Weight Championship, 60% should come from aerobic and the remaining 40% should from anaerobic exercises.

Lets look into the animal kingdom first.

The Cheetah is Nature's race car. It is the fastest land animal and has a beautiful aerodynamic body. Its favorite prey Gazelle/spring buck comes second close to that speed. This animal cheetah is the example for anaerobic exercise/sprint. The gazelle is for aerobic/endurance. Its speed is lower than the cheetah. That's why the gazelle can keep up its speed for a longer period,changing its course on the path,moving swift like a wind thus by wearing out the cheetah. If the gazelle can manage the lead for 15 secs, its saves its life! If the Cheetah can't hunt down its prey within 300 meters, the animal has to abandon its hunt as its heart rate goes up to 150 beats per minute and also the body temperature shoots to 105oF. This is the limitation imposed by anaerobic metabolism. The body can't sustain such high speeds for longer periods.

Most of Cheetah's hunting winds up in failure. Due to inbreeding, the cheetahs have genetic abnormalities(like twisted ankle which would be a disaster for the cat that depends on speed for its hunting) and their population has declined over the years that they are now considered as endangered species. Also due to their smaller size,weighing anywhere between 120-150 lbs, compared to other big cats weighing 250(female lion)-500(adult male lion) lbs, they are very vulnerable to lion/hyena attacks. This animal's flexible spinal cord allows it to change directions abruptly at extreme high speeds. Even sports car can't match this animal's body design. However, the cheetah can only maintain its speed for a maximum of 10-15 seconds. It accelerates 0-60mph under 2.5 sec. Note that cheetah has a very stream lined beautiful body unlike the gazelle. Recently, when I was watching Animal Planet, it was all about cheetah and its prey. The gazelle is sitting oblivious to the surroundings! It is separated from its gang. The cheetah had seen the gazelle and closed the gap between the two and locked its focus on the gazelle. I love gazelle's eyes. I was screaming "Gazelle baby, run for your life". I think the gazelle heard me! And started running,the cheetah chasing it. I felt a sigh of relief, when the gazelle took one turn at obtuse(more than 90 deg with the line of axis) angle, the cheetah just gave up:-) Oh What a life...

Lets take a look at the big cats like the lions and the tigers. There are lion fanatic fans and the tiger fans. I go for the lion. Many would claim that tigers can kill lions in split second just by its massive body! They are wrong from a scientific perspective. In any wild kingdom, the rule is survival of the fittest. In the wild, there is not much difference between a male lion(especially African lion) and the male tiger with respect to weight with the exception of Siberian tigers(few in numbers) which weigh 800-900 lbs. If the animal is too fat, and if its a carnivore, chances are less that it will be a good hunter! Scientifically speaking, the explosive muscle power doesn't come from fat! If you look at the tiger and the lion, you will notice that tiger looks little bit "unshapely" compared to the lion. This "unshapelyness" is due to body fat. A lion has a "well defined" physique(due to sheer muscle force) as compared to the tiger.

Let me remind the readers again, to have a shapely, muscled body, one has to do strengthening/anaerobic exercises. There is no other short cut. This is where the lion has an edge over the tiger. The tiger may act swiftly with his paws but they don't carry that much "damage" as the lion's paw swipe which may come slowly but it carries lot of weight. Muscle weight has more power than "muscle+fat" combined. Fat is like a cushion. One can't do much damage to another when one has fat layers. A lion is "ALL" muscle whereas the tiger is "muscle plus fat". An adult male lion carries 250 lbs of sheer muscle power on its back that allows him to go for an explosive hunt. A lion(like elephants who have brains) is a very smart, wrestler, strategic fighter and also a gentleman type. Even if the tiger is heavier(let's assume!)than the lion, it doesn't mean anything! See the example I'm going to give below. A tiger doesn't have the temperament to fight skillfully like the lion. Fat metabolism is not as efficient as carb metabolism. When the body needs energy immediately to bounce back/self defense, the body directly seeks the stored glycogen(in liver and muscles)for energy without any time delay whereas it takes more time for the body to convert fat into energy. But the energy derived from glycogen gets depleted very fast(within 30 minutes/anaerobic), so the body resorts to the stored fat for long term energy(aerobic). Any exercise that lasts for more than 30 minutes has to be supported by fat metabolism.

To further illustrate my point, I would like to give you some examples of the difference between the power that comes from sheer muscle force and the muscle+fat. In martial arts, the first step is "warm-up" exercise which is unlike any other warm-up exercise people do in aerobic and anaerobic exercises. The martial arts warm-up prepares the body for the toughness to take any physical blow. It also prepares the mind for alertness, and total concentration. I had a brief stint with Kung-Fu!

Take martial arts for example. Some martial arts guys who are not heavy can still beat up martial arts guys who are heavily built. What matters is the lean body mass that consists of muscle,bone and tissues. In general, men have less body fat compared to women. The movie Rocky series still drives many guys to do exercise religiously. In that series, Stallone fights with guys who are more heavily built than him but still Stallone comes out victorious in the end because he prepares his body in a natural setting. He practices physical toughness that he can take any blow from the opponent and still bounce back quickly while the opponent burns out fast. That's skillful fighting. A lion fits into this category. BTW, I love all animals. One of my dreams is to stand next to a live "alpha" male lion and take a picture. Can there be a better thrill in life than that?

The advantage of anaerobic exercise is to build strength/muscle power. For the same height and weight, a human male(applies to animals too) has more lean body mass than a female. A male has more blood volume hence haemoglobin count than a female. The disadvantage of anaerobic exercise is "acidity and waste" building up. One has to eliminate it through proper intake of food. Long term acidity can lead to osteoporosis/arthritis, kidney failure and other complications. Use common sense and seek suggestions(if you are not sure)before you start any exercise program. A person with very high/low blood pressure, diabetes(Type I & II),arthritis or any other ailments need to consult the Physician first and then start the exercise. Don't do things blindly!

In the next article, I will suggest various aerobic and anaerobic exercises that a person can implement in his daily life to keep physically fit. Finally I will explain what type of foods one should eat before and after aerobic/anaerobic exercises.

PS:Please share your comments or you can point out any technical mistakes/errors if I have made. I will be very happy to correct self.

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

Cheetahs are by nature v gentle..domesticated by ancient Egyptians..
BTW, your article reminded me of this..http://www.realyoga.org/weekly-lecture.php?mode=archive&id=34
you might have seen this b4.

Nappinnai NC said...

People have wrong notions about yoga. It comes from the root word "yuj" means "to yoke". You can connect any two and call it yoga! The problem with samskrt is it gives multiple meanings and hence scope for "misleading" misinterpretations.

The yoga that I know is from the Bhagavad Gita. One common thing that I have noticed in people who do yoga(I don't know what they mean by it!) is they are unshapely.

I use yoga as a means for stretching, flexibility,stability.

All animasl are gentle. They don't have natural enmity towards others.

Anonymous said...

Not all ppl doing yoga are unshapely..! Take yourself for one.

Yes, all animals are gentle.Humans need learn a lot from them.

Overall a good write up.Keep them coming.

Nappinnai NC said...

I am in shape, not because of yoga! I do lot of anaerobic exercise...To be very frank, I'm not much into yoga or for that matter Bhagavad Gita.

I can beat many people in Bhagavad Gita without any preparation. But I consider that as His blessings on me:-) One example:

Arjuna has "infinite" ego thinking that he is going to kill bhishma,dhrona and others.So he puts down his bow and arrow on the ground before even the war starts. He thinks adharma as dharma and dharma as adharma! To that dilemma of arjuna, the answer is in the 11th chapter of BG, where Krishna says "I have already slain these ppl, I'm only using you as a tool to accomplish My Tasks. So just do What I say and leave everything to Me,I will take care of You". But arjuna wasn't interested in spirituality but only in material things.

Physically I don't dvelve into yoga at all! I use spiritual scriptures(not the samskrt scriptures but the Divine thesis of the Mystical Saints of South India known as Azhvars) for my mind to be healthy. Sound mind leads to sound body.

Nappinnai NC said...

I would like to explain the difference between two modes of yoga. One is through the body(samskrt scriptures enforce the body as a means to do karma,jnyana or bhakti yoga)and the other through the mind(Mystical saints of South India are the examples). I belong to the latter category. In the latter path, the means as well as the end is God. Bhakti yoga is entirely different from the word bhakti used in a "loose" sense. Hope this helps.

Nappinnai NC said...

Hi Anonymous,
I have very clearly written in the very beginning of this article that one has to do "anaerobic" exercises to develop a flattering figure. I didn't say one has to do yoga! It looks like you don't read the articles properly:-)

Do you have any weight issues? Can suggest tips for you buddy. Let me know.

Anonymous said...

Hahaha.. Nice..
A small correction please.. Your Dec 1 article says about pH factor. I was reminded of the link i posted here as it says about pH & how nutrition is important for a meditative mind. You brought up the topic of yoga. You also said of using yoga for stretching.
Thanks, no weight issues..
Keep writing,
Best,,

Nappinnai NC said...

I don't think I ever brought up the word yoga or meditation before you did! I don't mix up things and say all(yoga,bodybuilding,etc)produces the same results. Nowhere in the Dec 1 article, I have mentioned yoga/meditation. I'm very cautious in using the words.

To me personally, stretching the body is not yoga. As I said I know the word yoga as per Bhagavad Gita. According to that definition, I don't use yoga. You quoted somebody and sent some website, so in response to that I said jokingly if you want you can consider stretching as yoga! But I don't. I keep myself away from yoga.

Do you know the difference between a yogi and muni?

Nappinnai NC said...

Hi Anonymous, whenever the topic goes tangent, you send it to my email address not this general forum. It may not serve any purpose for people who are not interested. Thanks

Suresh.N.C. said...

OK... what's the difference between a yogi and a muni?

Anonymous said...

A better option: let this be the topic for your next article. No one should have any problem with that then.
Muni as far as i know is someone who undergoes suffering,pain to acheive the goal. He follows mauna or silence/stillness of the mind.Dont know much though.
Also wonder if there is any difference between yogi & muni.. if yes, why then some are addressed as a Muni Yogi..?

Nappinnai NC said...

Anonymous, don't do literal translation:-)You invite lot of trouble for me.

A yogi is one who uses the "body" as a primary means to achieve his ends/goals while a "muni" uses his mind.

Suresh, in Tiruppavai:6, AndaL says "uLLaththukkondu munivargaLum yogigaLum mella ezhunthu...". If both words convey the same, AndaL wouldn't have used. Her name alone suggests that she ruled Him(her name is in past tense) while the rest of the azhvars(with the exception of madhura kavi)are in future tense! That's why we joke sometimes saying we should go follow these two(AndaL) and madhurakavi as they were crystal clear about Him while shaTakopa and other 9 azhvars were torn between union and separation from the Lord and hence were always in a dilemma. In TK,we have only 10 azhvars and not 12. AndaL and madhurakavi are considered as Acharyas.

Azhvars are munis and they address Him(you know who I refer to!)as muni. Rishis are yogis. Krishna was a true brahmachari! Recently,I had to explain to one of my IIT friend about Krishna wrt gopikas.

Suresh.N.C. said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Suresh.N.C. said...

Thanks..

Somehow I had the impression there were four yogas (Raja yoga, Gnana yoga, Bhakthi yoga & Hatha yoga) and it is only Hatha Yoga which emphasizes the body, and the other three had to do with the mind, like a "muni". Of course, today yoga almost always means Hatha yoga in popular connotation. So I had the impression that yogi = Hatha yogi, and muni, more like the other three. (Don't laugh ! )

Interesting, about Andal and other Alwars. Wonder why TKs call Andal and Madhurakavi as Acharyas and deny them Alwar-hood. (I am half-TK, half-VK, so not emotionally involved).

I will look for a factual & easy-to-read book on the Alwars. What book would you recommend? Let me also check our SUNY library.

Suresh.N.C. said...

(I deleted an earlier post, due to too many typos I made in that one).

Nappinnai NC said...

Hahaha.......I am getting infected by you and I also make many typos these days!

Do you know to read/write thamizh first?

Wrt God, I'm always reminded of Blaise Pascal's funny comment. Do you know what he said?

There are no great english translations as books for Azhvars. I want to do something along those lines. Although there are many short articles on them covered by many individuals in an authentic manner.

There are only 3 yogas(karma,gnyana,bhakti). This raja yoga etc, we don't consider as yogas! Some advaitins(like Nityananda hahahahhaha)preach Raja yoga. Even R himself didn't practise any of the 3 yogas as per Bhagavad Gita which is the essence of the vedas/upanishads. Veda consists of 4 parts samhitas,brahmanas,aranyakas and upanishads. All the first three portions talk about karma and ritualistic part(enna karmamo?)while the upanishads talk about Him and they appear at the end. In Bhagavad Gita 15:15, Krishna says "vedais ca sarvai hi,aham eva vedya:" meaning "I'm the One to be known in all the scriptures". We follow the route sharanagati which is a mental phenomenon. It is not a gross physical act like yoga!

A muni need not be a sannyasi. After all, sannyasa is a stage/ashrama/position in life.
A person who takes up that position/stage, "in principle/theory", should have vairaagya towards wordly things and raaga for Him alone. As long as you go by yoga, there are 100% chances that you will succumb to temptations! Whenever you slip, there are omissions and commissions to follow. It automatically revs up your ego!

But when you go by the other route sharanagati also known as prapatti, which is mentioned in shruti texts in many places, you are safe as it means the destruction of ego.

So, what is ego/ahankaram? Ego is the false knowledge that body and atma(whatever the english equivalent) are the same.

Vishvamitra went behind menaka;Indra always had an eye for other men's wives! There are zillion examples like this in the samskrt texts.

Krishna explains life thro' one prostitute. This is from Srimad Bhagavatam. The pros gets moksha and the saint goes to hell. So the saint,with ego, questions Him,"how come I being the saint going to hell, and she being the prostitute got moksham". The woman was selling her body,but her mind was with Him,no matter who touched her body,she was not affected by it, while this saint was behaving cheap by counting how many guys were visiting her daily. In the saint case, the mind was cheap and in the lady, it was pure.

Let me know about your thamizh fluency!!! If I have to do some justice to Socrates, I have to learn Greek. There is no other way out.

Enough of yogi! It tires me out.

PS:By reading books, you will not gain much as there are no authentic texts in English or any other Indian languages(other than Samskrt & Thamizh). Let me give you an example. Tulsi das was actually a 16th Century poet/devotee but he changed the history of Ramayana. It is he who came up with the crazy idea that Lord Rama worshipped shiva and invented a temple in Rameswaram. Nowhere in Valmiki Ramayana, which is the original and 1.75M yrs old(as NASA claimed about the sethu dam's age)it is mentioned. So, my suggestion would be for you to listen to Velukkudi starting with Tiruppavai. While learning this, you will hear about other Azhvars and samskrt vedas too.

Suresh.N.C. said...

Thanks for your painstaking reply. You have spent an inordinate amount of time on a guy like me, and I really appreciate your efforts.

Also, this is a health blog site, which I have hijacked to SV.

I suggest you start a separate blog site for SV. A blog site where people don't use phrases like "Adiyen", "Dasi", etc. There is so much fake humility in Vaishnavite blogs which I find disgusting, and hypocritical. These same people, after putting on this air of holiness and fake humility, get back to their rude selves after writing their nonsense in these blogs.

My Tamil fluency used to be very good. (I received a gold medal for my performance in Tamil in the pre-University Exam (Univ. of Madras). But that was a long time ago. Still I can easily get back to comprehending at that level. So go ahead, recommend some good books on Alwars in Tamil!

Thanks again.

Nappinnai NC said...

That was the best joke I have ever heard!!!!!!!!!!! You received Gold medal for your performance in Thamizh? Wow. Ok, I will send you book titles.

Arvy said...

Hello Nappinnai,

I'm Arvind Ramanujam from facebook.

You have mentioned that SV recommend only 3 yogas and Saranagathi, and do not include the Raja Yoga (Pathanjali Yoga). But the Bhakthi tradition of meditation is nothing but an adaptation of Pathanjali Yoga. For example the 6th, 7th & 8th step is Concentration, Meditation and Samadhi (together called Samyama). It looks to me that the whole of Hinduism can be reduced to these 4 Yogas and Saranagathi.

Have a nice day.